February 5, 2012

The facebook horror movie

I have one really good reason to be grateful for facebook, yet I still hate it. Why? Broadly, because it kills friendship.

Me and my 542 bestest friends (on Facebook)
Image by tychay via Flickr

Let’s expose a more minor annoyance first. People can’t bear to admit this: Fb is mostly pretty snooze-worthy. Even interesting lives are rendered dull by a succession of tedious updates. And I’m not just talking about your fb status, arse-numbingly leaden as it is. The situation is worse than that – I mean that my updates are just as bad. So we’re actually boring each other, sweeties.

But we can’t stop. Fb’s combination of voyeurism and exhibitionism is surprisingly addictive, even when you’re only letting me know about your clever cat or vile tax return. And now we’re getting mobile updates as well, so it’s only a matter of time before hand-held devices give way to wall-posts beamed directly into the brain. This is social-networking as smack, crack or crystal. It will destroy your soul.

I exaggerate? Well, let us go then, you and I, bfb -before facebook. It wasn’t that long ago, really. It only feels ages because your soul has been sucked. We’re going to a little country church. It’s a lovely Sunday in early spring. There are probably daffodils and primroses and dead bodies in the churchyard. Indoors, a small girl is restive. At last she breaks free from the attempts to make her sit still, pulls her coat right over her head, stumps off down the aisle mid-service, and shouts “I’m in disguise! I’m in disguise!”

I suppose she was briefly disguised. But they still knew who she was. And that is how things tend to work, even when we are not dealing with a child. One can see through people’s disguises, usually, quite soon – when they are with us, in the room, even on the ‘phone. Truly successful social con-artists are pretty rare.

Yet fb makes life very easy for those who want to pretend to be someone else and gain your trust, and for the dysfunctional weirdos who badly need to disguise what they really are. Now I’m not proposing some normals-only regime. I know you’re not normal, and I even have doubts about myself. But the whole fb apparatus of ‘friends’, ‘friends’ of ‘friends’, ‘friend’ inflation, and cosy mock-intimacy simply invites (ha! – the ‘friend’ invitation) fakery.

Obviously, amongst your 356 fb friends, there probably is at least one evil clown masquerading Blairishly as a regular kind of guy, worming your home address out of you, and appearing one night, very soon, at your bedside, with a huge knife. But he’s only part of a much wider fb fakery.

Fb encourages everyone to be a mini-celebrity via the ‘news’-feed. All is vanity, though however hard most people desperately polish their image on fb, it doesn’t shine, cos they ain’t that interesting. Few of us are. Meanwhile, younger online social-networkers think fb helps them define their identity. In fact it turns them into zombies.

And no amount of clicking on a ‘like’ button is going to change the world in some trendy cause. I mean, I like bumblebees, but…

Worse, Fb even manages to disguise who your real friends are, by creating a mashed-up soup of cannibalized acquaintances. Yuk. Now that really is a nasty image.

So to cheer yourself up, you’re wondering what happened to the small girl in the pre-fb idyll? Did spring turn to summer, and those bees buzz about, and all the birds of Oxfordshire and Gloucestershire sing and sing, and the grass rise higher and higher in the churchyard until some wanker with a mower arrived?

Yes, all of that happened. And the girl grew up, and is now sixteen and too independently-minded and grand to have a facebook account. How proud of her I am, and how I wish I had my daughter’s strength of character.

Thus we reach the apparent happy ending of the fb horror film. The serial killer is slain, and the virtuous, sole-surviving teenager staggers away from the carnage and into a sunny future.

Then the camera pulls back to reveal a final, bloody fb twist. The worst is left to last.

You have the Miliband brothers’ late father to thank for this scary insight. It’s no good whining that Ralph Miliband died ten years before the birth of fb. A dictionary of Marxism which he edited saw it coming. Maybe Marx himself saw it.
Capitalism turns our labour into a commodity, and fb helps the process to a logical extension, where social life is a competitive hell in which we consume each other; and, by collaborating with such blind enthusiasm, consume ourselves too.

Forget Area 51. Marx said the workers were alienated, and now you can be alienated in your free-time too. As an addicted, sleep-walking, self-deluded, flaky, faked-up, undead husk of a fb user, you might as well be your very own alien, because you certainly don’t know who you really are.

Still gagging for a happier final frame? Well, I did say fb had given me one good gift. If it hadn’t been for social-networking, I would never have met my girlfriend.

Reader, I stalked her.

Nick Bradbury
nebradbury@googlemail.com

Enhanced by Zemanta
Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Anonymous

    A friend of mine refuses to join Facebook – she considers it “the work of the devil” and I’m not sure that she’s kidding. Which actually is a shame, because it is useful for sharing photos with far away friends and family (and yes, I do keep my account very secure).

  • Anonymous

    I think it’s more fun than that… athough I do think it changes our behaviour a little, and will take some getting used to, but it’s not all so bad.

    It’s easier to keep up with friends and family, and you can use it as much or as little as you like.

    I use it a lot, for several different reasons.

    First I work from home, and I miss just generally having people to talk to in my everyday life – whether it’s about the latest book or TV show, or a story in the news. Even if it’s about something trivial like what I’m cooking today.

    Not only do I work from home, but I live with a chronic illness that makes it difficult for me to get out and socialise. Ten, twenty years ago unless friends and family made the effort to visit me – and many of them live too far away – I could go for weeks without seeing anyone but my beloved husband.

    I’m sure you are right about the dangers, and of course some people aren’t who they seem, and there are hidden agendas from selling to stalking all around. But that’s true in all of life really.

    It’s a question of finding the right balance – one that will be different for every individual. And at least on FB if you think I talk too much you can just hide me in your feed ;-)

  • Suhad Jarrar

    i like this blog, i love the style who its written, the humor and some of the facts; the happy ones like meeting a special person on FB etc…

    a freind of mine joined and found it untolarable as she felt so exposed. she didnt see the need or the value of sharing her photos or life with her family who live in another continent but prefered to stay on email and phone, in other words she couldnt handle the pressure of new stuff.

    i agree on what Ann says, it makes you connected with the world if you have limited access. it gives us sense of some thing, it doesnt have the pressur of face to face communication but also it doesnt have the same job of face to face communicaiton. nothing perfect, aprat from us girls of course ;)

  • Suahd Jarrar

    sorry i meant the JOY of personal communicaiton.

  • http://www.birdsontheblog.co.uk/ Sarah Arrow

    Reader, I stalked her! oh Nick, I love it :)

  • Morag

    My partner would rather cut his own heart out and cook it for lunch than join Facebook. I, on the other hand, love it. The only reason I love it so much is because he is not on there. If he joined, I would feel far more restricted in what I could post (he does know I’m wildly indiscreet about him on there, and it amuses him rather than bothers him – it’s a bit like hearing they know all about you on planet Jupiter) and in fact I might even leave.

    The other thing about Facebook is what so many people forget. No-one is forcing you to accept strangers as friends. I have something like 56 friends. I think there are 2 of them I “met” on Facebook, and they are friends of friends with whom I have interacted in the past on Facebook before accepting them as friends. There are also plenty of friends of friends who have invited me to become friends, whom I have turned down because I don’t actually know them. Also, I like to keep my profile a secure place for those of my friends who would feel exposed if their own friends became mine.

    My niece, on the other hand (who secretly defriended me a few months ago for criticising her appalling spelling and grammar once to often!) has something like 1,000 “friends”, the vast majority of whom she has never met and almost certainly never will. For people like her, who use Facebook completely uncritically, there is a real risk of her friends list hiding more than a few people masquerading as someone else.

  • Paul

    but that’s the nub, isn’t it, Ann, the aggregation of disseminated people – the online communities are what a disseminated population needs – and the online communities aren’t peopled entirely by stalkers, chiselers and groomers, and a smidgen of ‘caveat emptor’ will go as far in the online community as in the village you live – FB might remain majorly online, but others, like the recycling lists, allow for more dimensionality, including, as we found, ‘real-world’ friendships. If the social network seems to simply produce a ‘mashed-up soup of cannibalized acquaintances’ perhaps there is something awry with your perceptions, or the relations you choose to make on the network.
    But there’s another element to it, isn’t there?
    Three or four years ago, the idea of FB etc was fairly nauseating, this spilling your guts online. But it’s the modern confessional, isn’t it? And we all need the confessional in some form or other, be it partner or family, or, in my experience, someone who doesn’t give a damn – I’ve had many a cup of coffee spiced with the woes of a stranger who just wants to dump their grief and anguish – and that’s a good thing, because afterwards, I feel little or none of their pain, and they feel less of their pain.
    communities are what the members make them – and we are none of us conscripts.

  • Nick Bradbury

    Toby Young advises bloggers never to read comments posted online in this way as they are always written by nutters. Seems he’s wrong. Thanks for the kind, thoughtful and interesting points people have raised. For the record, I’m not persuaded by the utilitarian arguments.

    Not having blogged before, I was interested in other comments that reached me, including: “amusing”, “deep”, “witty” and, my personal favourite, “shit”. I found that last one on facebook.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1134202412 Morag Gaherty

    Nick, I visit plenty of blogs where the comments are written by unintelligent and plain rude people. In fact, I commented on a Facebook thread yesterday which resulted in someone calling me childish (but given how many people subsequently clicked “like” to my entirely sensible comment, I think the main thing they did was make themselves look silly).

    Here at Birds, however, I think the standard of commenting is very high – it’s because we’re all afraid of Babs or Sarah coming round to kneecap us if we don’t conform to expectations!

  • http://www.birdsontheblog.co.uk/ Sarah Arrow

    We no longer knee cap people Morag… we have a more efficient method… we feed them cake ;)

    On a serious note, some blogs do get filled with rabid comments, I am thankful that our small blog communities are populated with intelligent people who like to chat and read about diverse things :) I guess we got lucky :)

  • http://www.sendaflowercard.com Anita

    re – ‘Not only do I work from home, but I live with a chronic illness that makes it difficult for me to get out and socialise. Ten, twenty years ago unless friends and family made the effort to visit me – and many of them live too far away – I could go for weeks without seeing anyone but my beloved husband.’

    I know exactly what you mean …

  • Pingback: What do you mean by friend? | Birds on the Blog

  • Arwadk

    Yes! But is it ok that I disagree with it?lol I liked the part which said that ‘ it’s only a matter of time before hand-held devices give way to wall-posts beamed directly into the brain’ hahaha love it! That would be so cool!

    ‘Bfb’ – that’s a new term! I like it also!

    However, I must agree that many people on FB are in disguise! They pretend to be something they’re not but maybe it’s because that’s the only way they can feel that they’re somebody!

    Omg the part about the psycho friend! Umm wow! It could be true, yes, but that’s why u have to be smart when using fb!

    Looool@the gf part! So after all your criticism of fb u had to admit that it’s an amazing tool for meeting people! And networking and and and

    Sorry, but I LOVE fb :) xx

  • Simon

    I’m curious: did the FB culture create Channel Four’s BB or the other way around? :)

  • Pingback: Why I like my Nintendo DS | Birds on the Blog

  • Nick

    I think they both popped out of the quantum zeitgeist…

  • Morag

    Facebook was created as a Harvard-based means of communication in 2004. It is astonishing how fast it has grown and how quickly.

    Big Brother was originally developed in the Netherlands in 1999. So they may well be of the same zeigeist, but were created in different countries and half a decade apart (which is a long time in technology).